4.2 Article

Evaluation of the Effect of Acetyl L-Carnitine on Experimental Cisplatin Ototoxicity and Neurotoxicity

期刊

CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 186-194

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000323621

关键词

Cisplatin ototoxicity; Cisplatin neurotoxicity; Acetyl L-carnitine; Apoptosis; Ultrastructural findings

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Cisplatin (CDDP) is an effective and widely used chemotherapeutic agent for pediatric tumors, and ototoxicity is one of the dose-limiting side effects. Objective: It was the aim of our study to investigate the effect of acetyl L-carnitine (ALCAR) on experimental CDDP ototoxicity by audiologic tests, histomorphologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural examinations and to investigate the apoptotic pathways. Materials and Methods: Wistar albino rats (n = 28) were studied. Baseline audiological tests were performed in 4 groups: group 1, control; group 2, ALCAR; group 3, CDDP; group 4, CDDP + ALCAR-administered rats. Control audiological tests were performed on the 3rd day, and then the rats were sacrificed. Ear and brain specimens were examined by transmission electron microscopy, and caspase 3, 8 and 9 activities were investigated. Results: The CDDP-administered rats showed significant auditory brainstem response threshold shifts using all stimuli (clicks, 6-kHz and 8-kHz tone burst) compared with the control groups. The CDDP + ALCAR-administered rats showed significant auditory brainstem response threshold shifts by only click stimuli compared with the control groups. In the brain, spiral ganglion and organ of Corti, ultrastructural damage was prominent in group 3; the number of TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling)-positive cells and caspase 3, 8 and 9 immunostaining cells was significantly high in group 3. Conclusion: ALCAR improves CDDP-induced auditory impairment, and also antioxidative and antiapoptotic properties of ALCAR on CDDP ototoxicity were supported by the findings. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据