4.7 Article

Alumina polymorphs affect the metal immobilization effect when beneficially using copper-bearing industrial sludge for ceramics

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 575-581

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.065

关键词

Copper; Industrial sludge; Alumina; Immobilization; Leaching

资金

  1. General Research Fund Scheme of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [716310E, 715612E]
  2. HKU Strategic Research Theme on Clean Energy and Earth as a Habitable Planet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of recycling copper-bearing industrial sludge as a part of ceramic raw materials was evaluated through thermal interaction of sludge with aluminum-rich precursors. To observe copper incorporation mechanism, mixtures of copper-bearing sludge with alumina polymorphs (gamma-Al2O3 and alpha-Al2O3) were fired between 750 and 1250 degrees C. Different copper-hosting phases were identified by X-ray diffraction, and CuAl2O4 was found to be the predominant phase throughout the reactions. The experimental results indicate different CuAl2O4 initiating temperatures for two alumina materials, and the optimal temperature for CuAl2O4 formation is around 1100 degrees C. To monitor the stabilization effect, prolonged leaching tests were carried out to leach sintered products for up to 20 d. The results clearly demonstrate a substantial decrease in copper leachability for products with higher CuAl2O4 content formed from both alumina precursors despite their different sintering behavior. Meanwhile, the leachability of aluminum was much lower than that of copper, and it decreased by more than fourfold through the formation of CuAl2O4 spinel in gamma-Al2O3 system. This study clearly indicates spinel formation as the most crucial metal stabilization mechanism when sintering multiphase copper-bearing industrial sludge with aluminum-rich ceramic raw materials, and suggests a promising and reliable technique for reusing industrial sludge. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据