4.7 Article

Catalytic reforming of toluene as tar model compound: Effect of Ce and Ce-Mg promoter using Ni/olivine catalyst

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 40-46

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.087

关键词

Tar; Olivine; Toluene reforming; Ce-Mg promoter; Coking; H2S poison

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20577046]
  2. Zhengzhou Bureau of Science and Technology [111PCXTD165, 122PYSGZ824]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tar produced by biomass gasification as a route of renewable energy must be removed before the gas can be used. This study was undertaken using toluene as a model tar compound for evaluating its steam reforming conversion with three Ni-based catalysts, Ni/olivine, Ni-Ce/olivine and Ni-Ce-Mg/olivine. Effects of Ce and Mg promoters on the reaction activity and coke deposition were studied. Overall the performance of Ce and Mg promoted Ni/olivine catalysts is better than that of only Ce promoter and Ni/olivine alone. The experimental results indicate that Ni-Ce-Mg/olivine catalysts could improve the resistance to carbon deposition, enhance energy gases yield and resist 10 ppm H2S poison at 100 mL min(-1) for up to 400 min. Furthermore, the activity of catalysts was related to the steam/carbon (S/C) ratios; at S/C ratio = 5, T = 790 degrees C, space velocity = 78211(-1) and t = 2 h, the Ni-Ce-Mg/olivine system yielded 89% toluene conversion, 5.6 L h(-1) product gas rate, 62.6 mol% H-2 content and 10% (mol useful gas mol(-1) toluene) energy yield. Moreover, at low S/C ratio, it had higher reaction activity and better ability to prevent coking. There is a small amount of carbon deposition in the form of amorphous carbon after 7 h. Various characterization techniques such as XRD, FTIR and thermogravimetric were performed to investigate the coke deposition of Ni/olivine, Ni-Ce/olivine and Ni-Ce-Mg/olivine. It is suggested that 3% Ni-1% Ce-1% Mg/olivine was the most promising catalyst due to its minimum coke amount and the lower activation energy of coke burning. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据