4.7 Article

Denitrification performance and biofilm characteristics using biodegradable polymers PCL as carriers and carbon source

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 91, 期 9, 页码 1310-1316

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.064

关键词

Biodegradable polymers; Denitrification; Nitrate removal; Solid carbon source; Water treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51178241]
  2. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Plan) [2009AA062903]
  3. National ST Major Project [2008ZX07102-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a fixed bed bioreactor filled with biopolymer polycaprolactone (PCL) was developed to remove nitrate from groundwater through denitrification. PCL serves both as carbon source and biofilm carriers. During a long-term operation of 561 d, the performance of the reactor in nitrogen removal, characteristics of biofilm attached to biodegradable carriers, and the hydrolysis and utilization of solid carbon source were studied. With temperatures exceeding 24 degrees C, the average nitrate concentration in the effluent was lower than 3.7 mg N L-1, and more than 95% of TN was removed at hydraulic retention time of 3-6 h. Nitrite and ammonium remained at low levels (less than 0.32 and 0.78 mg N L-1, respectively). The calculated PCL amount consumed ranged between 1.6 and 3.7 g PCL g(-1) NO3-N. The FT-IR spectrum of the used PCL indicated the chain scission by hydrolytic degradation. A pyrosequencing analysis of the biofilm showed that genus Diaphorobacter belonging to family Comamonadaceae accounted for most of the sequences. Bacteria of genera Hydrogenophaga, Rhodocyclaceae uncultured and Desulfovibrio were highly enriched in the PCL biofilm. Microelectrode data indicated that the biofilm had an average thickness of around 800 gm and the intensive denitrification activities occurred in the area of 300-500 mu m of biofilm with values up to 400 mu mol cm(-3) h(-1). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据