4.7 Article

Determination of PM10 and its ion composition emitted from biomass burning in the chamber for estimation of open burning emissions

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 93, 期 9, 页码 1912-1919

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.071

关键词

Ion composition; PM10; Biomass burning; Agricultural and forest burning; Emission rate; Emission factor

资金

  1. Center for Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology (EHT)
  2. National Research University (NRU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass samples including agricultural waste (rice straw and maize residue) and forest leaf litter were collected from Chiang Mai Province, Thailand for the burning experiment in the self-designed stainless steel chamber to simulate the emissions of PM10. The burning of leaf litter emitted the highest PM10 (1.52 +/- 0.65 g kg(-1)). The PM10-bound ions emitted from the burning of rice straw and maize residue showed the same trend, which was K+ > Cl- > SO42- > NH4+ > NO3-. However, the emissions from maize residue burning were similar to 1.5-2.0 times higher than those from the rice straw burning. The ion content emitted from leaf litter burning was almost the same for all ion species. Noticeably, K+ and Cl- concentrations were similar to 2-4 times lower than those emitted from agricultural waste burning. It can be deduced that K+ and Cl- were highly emitted from agricultural waste burning due to the use of fertilizer and herbicides in the field, respectively. Based on emission values obtained from the chamber, the pollutant emission rate from open burning was calculated. Burned areas in Chiang Mai Province were 3510 and 866 km(2) in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Forest burning was 71-88%, while agricultural land burning accounted for 12-29% (rice field: crop field = 1:3) of total burned area. Therefore, emissions of PM10 from open burning in Chiang Mai were 3051 ton (2010) and 705 ton (2011). Major ions emitted from agricultural waste burning were found to be K+ and Cl-, while those from forest burning were SO42- and K+. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据