4.7 Article

Indigenous microbes survive in situ ozonation improving biodegradation of dissolved organic matter in aged oil sands process-affected waters

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 93, 期 11, 页码 2748-2755

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.026

关键词

Ozone treatment; Naphthenic acids; Oil sands process-affected water; Biodegradation; Organic matter; End-pit lakes

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council Strategic Grant
  2. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures
  3. National Science and Engineering Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oil sands industry faces significant challenges in developing effective remediation technologies for process-affected water stored in tailings ponds. Naphthenic acids, a complex mixture of cycloaliphatic carboxylic acids, have been of particular concern because they concentrate in tailings ponds and are a component of the acutely toxic fraction of process water. Ozone treatment has been demonstrated as an effective means of rapidly degrading naphthenic acids, reducing process water toxicity, and increasing its biodegradability following seeding with the endogenous process water bacteria. This study is the first to examine subsequent in situ biodegradation following ozone pretreatment. Two aged oil sands process-affected waters from experimental reclamation tailings ponds were ozonated to reduce the dissolved organic carbon, to which naphthenic acids contributed minimally (<1 mg L-1). Treatment with an ozone dose of 50 mg L-1 improved the 84 d biodegradability of remaining dissolved organic carbon during subsequent aerobic incubation (11-13 mg L-1 removed from aged process-affected waters versus 5 mg L-1 when not pretreated with ozone). The ozone-treated indigenous microbial communities were as capable of degrading organic matter as the same community not exposed to ozone. This supports ozonation coupled with biodegradation as an effective and feasible treatment option. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据