4.7 Article

Measurement of associations of pharmaceuticals with dissolved humic substances using solid phase extraction

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 91, 期 3, 页码 314-319

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.039

关键词

Pharmaceutical; Dissolved organic matter; Measurement method; Sorption; Transport

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2009-65102-05847]
  2. Michigan AgBioResearch
  3. NIFA [2009-65102-05847, 688159] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative method was developed to determine association of carbadox, lincomycin and tetracycline with dissolved humic acids using solid phase extraction (SPE). Dissolved organic matter (DOM) and DOM-bound pharmaceuticals passed through the SPE cartridge while the cartridge retained freely dissolved pharmaceuticals from water. This method was validated by comparison with the results measured using the common equilibrium dialysis technique. For the SPE method pharmaceutical interaction with DOM required similar to 30 h to approach the equilibration, whereas 50-120 h was needed for the equilibrium dialysis technique. The uneven distributions of freely membrane-penetrating pharmaceuticals and protons inside vs. outside of the dialysis cell due to the Donnan effect resulted in overestimates of pharmaceutical affinity with DOM for the equilibrium dialysis n thod. The SPE technique eliminates the Donnan effect, and demonstrates itself as a more efficient, less laborious and more accurate method. The measured binding coefficients with DOM followed the order of carbadox < lincomycin < tetracycline. Pharmaceutical bindings with Leonardite humic acid were greater than those with Aldrich humic acid due to more interaction sites, i.e. carboxylic and phenolic functional moieties, present in the Leonardite humic acid. The results obtained suggest that many pharmaceuticals could be significantly bound to DOM, which alters their fate and mobility in the environment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据