4.7 Article

CORAL: QSPR model of water solubility based on local and global SMILES attributes

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 877-880

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.035

关键词

Water solubility; QSPR; Monte Carlo technique; CORAL software

资金

  1. ANTARES [LIFE08-ENV/IT/00435]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF/CREST HRD-0833178]
  3. National Science Foundation (EPSCoR Award) [362492-190200-01/NSFEPS-090378]
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  5. Division Of Human Resource Development [833178] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. EPSCoR
  7. Office Of The Director [903787] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water solubility is an important characteristic of a chemical in many aspects. However experimental definition of the endpoint for all substances is impossible. In this study quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) for negative logarithm of water solubility-log S (mol L-1) are built up for five random splits into the sub-training set (approximate to 55%), the calibration set (approximate to 25%), and the test set (approximate to 20%). Simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) is used as the representation of the molecular structure. Optimal SMILES-based descriptors are calculated by means of the Monte Carlo method using the CORAL software (http://www.insilico.eu/coral). These one-variable models for water solubility are characterized by the following average values of the statistical characteristics: n(sub_train) = 725-763: n(calib) = 312-343; n(test) = 231-261; r(sub_train)(2) = 0.9211 +/- 0.0028; r(calib)(2) = 0.9555 +/- 0.0045; r(test)(2) = 0.9365 +/- 0.0073; S-sub_train = 0.561 +/- 0.0086; S-calib = 0.453 +/- 0.0209: s(test) = 0.520 +/- 0.0205. Thus, the reproducibility of statistical quality of suggested models for water solubility confirmed for five various splits. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据