4.7 Article

Enchytraeus crypticus as model species in soil ecotoxicology

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 87, 期 11, 页码 1222-1227

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.021

关键词

Enchytraeid reproduction test (ERT); Enchytraeus crypticus; Cadmium; Carbendazim; Phenanthrene; Chloroanilines

资金

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [SFRH/BD/46759/2008]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/46759/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enchytraeids are ecologically relevant soil organisms, due to their activity in decomposition and bioturbation in many soil types worldwide. The enchytraeid reproduction test (ERT) guidelines ISO 16387 and OECD 220 are exclusive to the genus Enchytraeus and recommend using the species E. albidus with a 6-week test period. The suggested alternative, E. crypticus has a shorter generation time which may enable the ERT to be twice as fast. To confirm the suitability of a 3-week test period for E. crypticus, the toxicity of five chemicals, with distinct properties and modes of action, was assessed in LUFA 2.2 soil. In all controls the validity criteria were met, as survival of E. crypticus was above 92% and more than 772 juveniles were produced. The good performance supports its appropriateness as model species. Reproduction was more sensitive than survival, with only cadmium and 3,5-dichloroaniline causing significant lethal effects in the tested concentration ranges. The effect concentration causing 50% reduction in the number of juveniles (EC50) was 35 mg kg(-1) for cadmium, <1.0 mg kg(-1) for carbendazim, 145 mg kg(-1) for phenanthrene, 275 mg kg(-1) for pentachloroaniline and 102 mg kg(-1) for 3,5-dichloroaniline. To evaluate the sensitivity of E. crypticus, the present results were compared to literature data for E. albidus. In conclusion, E. crypticus is a suitable model species in soil ecotoxicology, with advantages such as good control performance and speed, leading to a reliable and faster ERT. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据