4.7 Article

Organochlorine pesticide residues in sediments from the Uganda side of Lake Victoria

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 130-136

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.010

关键词

Persistent organic pollutants; Pesticides; Metabolites; Lake Victoria; Sediment

资金

  1. Uppsala University, Sweden
  2. Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  3. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organochlorine (OC) residues were analysed in 117 sediment samples collected from four bays of the Uganda side of Lake Victoria. The sediments were collected with a corer at a depth of 0-20 cm, and extracted for OC residues using a solid dispersion method. The extracts were cleaned using gel permeation chromatography and analysed for pesticide residues using a gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with an electron capture detector. The results were confirmed using a GC equipped with a mass spectrometer (MS). A total of 16 OC residues, most of them persistent organic pollutants (POPs) were identified and quantified. The OC residue levels were expressed on an oven dry weight (d.w.) basis. Endosulphan sulphate, in the range of 0.82-5.62 mu g kg(-1) d.w., was the most frequently detected residue. Aldrin and dieldrin were in the ranges of 0.22-15.96 and 0.94-7.18 mu g kg(-1) d.w., respectively. DDT and its metabolites lay between 0.11-3.59 for p,p'-DDE, 0.38-4.02 for p,p'-DDD, 0.04-1.46 for p,p'-DDT, 0.07-2.72 for o,p'-DDE and 0.01-1.631 mu g kg(-1) d.w. for p,p'-DDT. The levels of gamma-HCH varied from 0.05 to 5.48 mu g kg(-1) d.w. Heptachlor was detected only once at a level of 0.81 mu g kg(-1) d.w., while its photo-oxidation product, heptachlor epoxide, ranged between non-detectable (ND) to 3.19 mu g kg(-1) d.w. Chlordane ranged from ND to 0.76 mu g kg(-1) d.w. Based on the threshold effect concentration (TEC) for fresh water ecosystems, aldrin and dieldrin were the only OCs that seemed to be a threat to the lake environment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据