4.7 Article

Cellular uptake and mutagenic potential of metal oxide nanoparticles in bacterial cells

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 83, 期 8, 页码 1124-1132

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.025

关键词

Nanoparticle uptake; Bacteria; S. typhimurium; Flow cytometry; ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles; Ames mutagenicity test

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India [SR/S5/NM-01/2007]
  2. CSIR, New Delhi [NWP34, NWP35]
  3. Supra-institutional Project [SIP-08]
  4. Department of Science and Technology-UK India Education and Research Initiative [UKIERI] [DST/INT/UKIERI/SA/P-10/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive production and consumption of nanomaterials such as ZnO and TiO2 has increased their release and disposal into the environment. The accumulation of nanoparticles (NPs) in ecosystem is likely to pose threat to non-specific targets such as bacteria. The present study explored the effect of ZnO and TiO2 NPs in a model bacterium, Salmonella typhimurium. The uptake of ZnO and TiO2 bare NPs in nano range without agglomeration was observed in S. typhimurium. TEM analysis demonstrated the internalization and uniform distribution of NPs inside the cells. Flow cytometry data also demonstrates that both ZnO and TiO2 NPs were significantly internalized in the S. typhimurium cells in a concentration dependent manner. A significant increase in uptake was observed in the S. typhimurium treated even with 8 and 80 ng ml(-1) of ZnO and TiO2 NPs with S9 after 60 min, possibly the formation of micelles or protein coat facilitated entry of NPs. These NPs exhibited weak mutagenic potential in S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA1537 and Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA) of Ames test underscoring the possible carcinogenic potential similar to certain mutagenic chemicals. Our study reiterates the need for re-evaluating environmental toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 NPs presumably considered safe in environment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据