4.7 Article

Photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene over Ag-doping TiO2 nanotube powder prepared by anodization coupled with impregnation method

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 674-679

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.043

关键词

Toluene; TiO2 nanotubes; Silver doped; Photocatalytic degradation; In situ FTIR

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [20837001, NSFC-RGC 21061160495, 20877013]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2007AA061402, 2009AA062604]
  3. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB613306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, Ag-doping TiO2 nanotubes were prepared and employed as the photocatalyst for the degradation of toluene. The TiO2 nanotube powder was produced by the rapid-breakdown potentiostatic anodization of Ti foil in chloride-containing electrolytes, and then doped with Ag through an incipient wetness impregnation method. The samples were characterized by scanning electron microscope, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction, surface photovoltage measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and N-2 adsorption. The nanotubular TiO2 photocatalysts showed an outer diameter of approximately 40 am, fine mesoporous structure and high specific surface area. The photocatalytic activity of Ag-doping TiO2 nanotube powder was evaluated through photooxidation of gaseous toluene. The results indicated that the degradation efficiency of toluene could get 98% after 4 h reaction using the Ag-doping TiO2 nanotubes as the photocatalyst under UV light illumination, which was higher than that of the pure TiO2 nanotubes, Ag-doping P25 or P25. Benzaldehyde species could be observed during the photocatalytic oxidation monitored by in situ FTIR, and the formed benzaldehyde intermediate during reaction would be partially oxidized into CO2 and H2O. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据