4.7 Article

Contamination and bioaccumulation of benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers in fish from Manila Bay, the Philippines using an ultra-fast liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 751-758

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.054

关键词

BUVSs; Bioaccumulation; Stable isotope; Fish; Manila Bay

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology (MEXT) [20221003, 23710077]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. MEXT
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23710077, 20221003, 21310043] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers (BUVSs) used in plastic products, building materials and personal hygiene products were analyzed in fishes collected from Manila Bay, the Philippines. BUVSs were detected at ng g(-1) level in all the fish samples, indicating their ubiquitous contamination in coastal waters. Among the targeted eight BUVSs, UV-328 was predominantly found with a mean concentration of 34.2 ng g(-1) lipid weight, implying large scale production and use of this compound in the Philippines. High concentrations of Sigma BUVSs were found in bumpnose trevally (Carangoides hedlandensis), bluetail mullet (adult) (Valamugil buchanani), common ponyfish (Leiognathus equulus) and coral grouper (adult) (Epinephelus corallicola) indicating their active uptake and/or lower metabolic capacity to eliminate BUVSs. Among BUVSs, UV-P showed significant positive relationship (p < 0.05) between concentration and fish length (r = 0.29) and fish weight (r = 0.31). Levels of UV-P in demersal species had positive correlation with delta N-15, indicating that possibile sink of UV-P is bottom sediment in the bay, and ultimately accumulate through benthic food web rather than pelagic food web. To our knowledge, this is the first study on BUVSs distribution in fish from developing countries. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据