4.7 Article

Trophic transfer of TiO2 nanoparticles from daphnia to zebrafish in a simplified freshwater food chain

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 79, 期 9, 页码 928-933

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.022

关键词

TiO2 nanoparticle; Daphnia magna; Danio rerio; Trophic transfer; Bioconcentration; Biomagnification

资金

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency [RD831713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid development of nanotechnology and the corresponding increase in the use of manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) in commercial products have led to concerns about the health risks and environmental impacts of such nanosized materials. One of the most significant and currently not well-understood risks is their potential transfer and magnification in food webs. To address this concern, a simplified model of a freshwater food chain including a low trophic level organism (daphnia. Daphnia magna) and a high trophic level organism (zebrafish, Danio rerio) was established. Our results provide the first direct evidence that nanoscale TiO2 particles (nTiO(2)) can transfer from D. magna to D. rerio by dietary exposure. However, no biomagnifications of nTiO(2) was observed in this simplified food chain because the values of the biomagnification factors (BMF) in this study (0.024 and 0.009) were all less than one. Compared to the dietary intake, D. rerio could accumulate nTiO(2) by aqueous exposure with high bio-accumulation factors (BCFs) of 25.38 and 181.38 for 0.1 and 1.0 mg L-1 exposure groups, respectively. Nevertheless, higher body burden of nTiO(2) in the dietary exposure groups than that in the aqueous exposure groups demonstrated that dietary intake may constitute a major route of potential nanomaterial exposure for a higher trophic level of aquatic organisms. This study represents the first examination of the potential food chain transfer and biomagnification of nTiO(2) in an aquatic ecosystem. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据