4.7 Article

Adsorption of Triton X-series surfactants and its role in stabilizing multi-walled carbon nanotube suspensions

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 362-367

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.023

关键词

Aggregation; Dispersion; Nanoparticles; Carbon nanotubes; Surfactants

资金

  1. USDA [MAS00978]
  2. NSF [CMMI-0531171]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2008CB418204]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40873072]
  5. Education Ministry of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surfactants can enhance the stabilization of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in water through their adsorption, thus affecting the environmental behavior and application of CNTs. However, the quantitative relationship between adsorption and stabilization and the role of the surfactant structure in the surfactant-CNT interactions are largely unknown. Therefore, Triton X-series surfactants with a same hydrophobic functional group (4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl) and different hydrophilic polyethoxyl chain lengths were selected to investigate their adsorption onto CNTs and their ability to stabilize CNT suspensions. Adsorption data were fitted well by Langmuir equation, indicating monolayer coverage on CNTs. Adsorption capacities of the surfactants increased with decreasing hydrophilic chain length: Triton-305 < Triton-165 < Triton-114 < Triton-100. Electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bond could be excluded as the main mechanism because adsorption was not significantly affected by pH change. Hydrophobic and pi-pi interactions between the surfactants and CNTs were the dominant mechanism for their adsorption. CUT suspension data were well fitted to a nonlinear equation with a similar form to the Langmuir equation. Suspended CUT amounts in water were positively related to the adsorption capacities of the surfactants, but negatively with the hydrophilic fraction ratio of the X-series surfactants. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据