4.7 Article

Protein profiles in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brains exposed to chronic microcystin-LR

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 81, 期 6, 页码 716-724

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.061

关键词

Microcystin-LR; Protein phosphatase; Proteomics; Chronic toxicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40806051]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcystin-LR (MCLR) is a commonly encountered blue-green algal hepatotoxin and a known inhibitor of cellular protein phosphatase (PP), however, little is known about its neurotoxicity. This study investigated the protein profiles of zebrafish (Danio rerio) brains chronically exposed to MCLR concentrations (2 or 20 mu g L-1) using the proteomic approach. The results showed that MCLR strikingly enhanced toxin accumulation and the PP activity in zebrafish brains after 30 d exposure. Comparison of two-dimensional electrophoresis protein profiles of MCLR exposed and non-exposed zebrafish brains revealed that the abundance of 30 protein spots was remarkably altered in response to MCLR exposure. These proteins are involved in cytoskeleton assembly, macromolecule metabolism, oxidative stress, signal transduction, and other functions (e.g. transporting, protein degradation, apoptosis and translation), indicating that MCLR toxicity in the fish brain is complex and diverse. The chronic neurotoxicity of MCLR might initiate the PP pathway via an upregulation of PP2C in the zebrafish brain, in addition to the reactive oxygen species pathway. Additionally, the increase of vitellogenin abundance in MCLR exposed zebrafish brains suggested that MCLR might mimic the effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals. This study demonstrated that MCLR causes neurotoxicity in zebrafish at the proteomic level, which provides a new insight into MCLR toxicity in aquatic organisms and human beings. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据