4.7 Article

In situ remediation of metal-contaminated soils with organic amendments: Role of humic acids in copper bioavailability

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 79, 期 8, 页码 844-849

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.054

关键词

Biosolid compost; Humic acids; Langmuir isotherm; Leonardite; Soil contamination; Soil organic matter

资金

  1. CSIC
  2. Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science
  3. CICYT [2004-01985/TECNO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purposes of this study were to determine the Cu(II) binding behavior of humic acids (HAs) isolated from biosolid compost (BI), leonardite (LE), a metal-contaminated soil, and the soil remediated with either BI or LE in relation to their structural properties, and to explore the role exerted by the HA fractions in controlling soil Cu(II) bioavailability. Potentiometric titrations at pH 5 and ionic strength 0.1 M and the Langmuir model were used to obtain the Cu(II) complexing capacity of the HAs examined and the conditional stability constant of the Cu(II)-HA complexes. The Cu(II) complexing capacity increased as the content of acidic ligands, especially COOH groups, aromaticity, and humification degree increased, following the order BI-HA < BI-amended soil HAs < unamended soil HA < LE-amended soil HAs < LE-HA. In contrast, the conditional stability constant of Cu(II)-HA complexes increased in the opposite order, probably due to an increased chelating effect. Compared to LE, amendment with BI was slightly more effective in decreasing soil CaCl(2)-extractable Cu content. The results obtained suggested that the pH of the soil-amendment system is the most important chemical property governing Cu(II) solubility and bioavailability in metal-contaminated soils remediated with BI and LE, although soil organic matter and the HA fraction may also be important factors. In particular, binding sites formed by N-, S-, and O-containing acidic functional moieties in HAs may play an important role in the Cu(II) behavior. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据