4.7 Article

Pb, Zn and Cd mobility, availability and fractionation in aged soil remediated by EDTA leaching

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 74, 期 10, 页码 1367-1373

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.013

关键词

Remediation; Residual fraction; Heavy metals; Mobility; Availability; Soil ageing

资金

  1. Slovenian Ministry for Education, Science and Sport [J4 9277]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil washing remediation techniques usually remove only the labile heavy metal (HM) species from the soil, leaving the residual ones in less available/mobile forms, thus disturbing the chemical equilibrium among different species of HM in the soil. Re-establishing such equilibrium and shifting HM back to more available/mobile chemical forms could occur after exposing the remediated soil to environmental abiotic (ageing) factors. Contaminated soil from a smelter site (Pb 4600 mg kg(-1), Zn 1800 mg kg(-1), Cd 30 mg kg(-1))was leached with increasing EDTA concentrations (2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0 and 4-consecutive steps of 40.0 mmol EDTA kg(-1) of soil), A gradient of removed HM was reached: from 6% to 73% of initial Pb, from 3% to 23% of initial Zn and from 17% to 74% of initial Cd were removed. Repetitive temperature changes (105 degrees C and -20 degrees C) were used to mimic abiotic factors acting on residual HM after EDTA soil leaching in saturated soil at 10% and 90% of soil water holding capacity. Fractionation using sequential extractions, mobility, and phytoavailability of Pb, Zn and Cd and Pb oral bioavailability were determined for aged and non-aged soil. The ageing treatment consistently lowered HM phytoavailability in the original (non-leached) and all treated (chelant-leached) soils. However, Pb, Zn and Cd behaved differently from each other; Pb mobility increased, Cd mobility decreased, while Zn mobility did not change. The results indicate that abiotic (ageing) processes change the availability/mobility of residual HM in all leaching treatments and should thus be considered in final remediation effectivity evaluation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据