4.7 Article

Exposure routes of copper: Short term effects on survival, weight, and uptake in Florida apple snails (Pomacea paludosa)

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 407-414

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.004

关键词

Soil exposure; Water exposure; Copper bioavailability; Copper uptake; Pomacea paludosa; Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The uptake and effects (Survival, weight) of copper (Cu) on Florida apple snails (Pomacea paludosa) via exposures to copper-enriched agricultural soil-water and water-only treatments were investigated. Soils were collected from citrus sites in south Florida and flooded with laboratory freshwater for 14 d. Neonate apple snails (<= 96-h-old) were then exposed to either Cu from a soil-overlying water (i.e., flooded agricultural soils) treatment or overlying water-only (i.e., equilibrated overlying water produced from 14 d flooding of agriculture soils) treatment for 14 d under standard laboratory conditions. Survival, weight (dry, wet), and whole body Cu uptake were measured. Copper exposure via soil-water exposures resulted in higher mortality and whole body Cu uptake than water-only exposures, indicating Cu uptake from soils. However, snail wet and dry weights were higher in soil-water treatments than in water-only treatments. Micronutrients from soils may be consumed by snails increasing weights. Survival, apple snail dry weight, and whole body Cu concentrations were significantly correlated with soil and water Cu concentrations in soil-water treatments. Survival was significantly correlated with the concentration of Cu(CO3)(2)(2-) in water-only treatments. This suggests that Cu(CO3)(2)(2-) is toxic to apple snails. Whole body Cu concentrations were higher in surviving snails than dead snails, suggesting that apple snails have the ability to detoxify accumulated Cu (e.g., through metallothionein induction, granules). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据