4.7 Article

Inter- and intra-specific variation on sensitivity of larval amphibians to nitrite

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 507-514

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.09.054

关键词

nitrite; amphibian larvae sensitivity; Epidalea calamita; Pelophylax perezi; Hyla meridionalis; inter- and intra-specific variation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several authors have suggested that nitrogen-based fertilizers may be contributing to the global amphibian decline. We have studied the impact of sodium nitrite on early aquatic stages of Epidalea calamita, Pelophylax perezi and Hyla meridionalis larvae from Do (n) over tilde ana National Park (coastal wetland) and P. perezi from Gredos Mountain (high mountain ponds), exposed during 10 to 16 days. After 8 days of exposure all P. perezi larvae from Do (n) over tilde ana presented 100% mortality at 5 mg l(-t) N-NO2- while E calamita larvae mortality rates were significantly lower at that concentration after 15 days. However, for H. meridionalis at day 15 no deaths were registered at 5 mg l(-1) N-NO2 and at 20 mg l(-1) N-NO2- presented intermediate mortality rates. In Do (n) over tilde ana the 10 d LC50 of older H. meridionalis larvae was between 20 and 30 mg l(-1) N-NO2- whilst for P. perezi it was below 5 mg l(-1) N-NO2-. These results indicate interspecific variation of the sensitivity of larval amphibians to nitrite. Gredos Mountain P. perezi larvae exposed since the egg stage were highly sensitive to nitrite, with a 16 d LC50 below 0.5 mg l(-1) N-NO2-. The same species in Do (n) over tilde ana had a 15 d LC50 between 5 and mg l(-1) N-NO2-. These results suggest that there is also intra-specific variation in sensitivity of amphibian larvae to nitrite: mountain amphibian populations appear to be more sensitive to polluted environments than coastal populations. Geographic and genetic variation and evolutionary adaptation of tolerance may also be the keys to variation amongst populations of the same species. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据