4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC) retention time shift correction and modeling using bilinear peak alignment, correlation optimized shifting and multivariate curve resolution

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.02.003

关键词

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography; Retention time shift; Peak alignment; Multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares; Bilinear peak alignment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combination of peak alignment methods and multivariate curve resolution (MCR) is proposed for handling retention time shifts and modeling of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic (GC x GC) data in the case of univariate detection systems such as in flame ionization detection (FID) or in total ion current mass spectrometry (TIC-MS) detection. A new bilinear peak alignment (BPA) method, based on MCR, is first proposed to correct for progressive within run retention time shifts in GC x GC due to temperature programming effects on second chromatographic dimension. The performance of the proposed peak alignment method is compared to that of the correlation optimized warping (COW) method. In addition, Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS) method, under proper constraints, is also proposed to analyze the augmented GC x GC data matrix for the resolution and quantification of target compounds in complex samples when incomplete separation and co-elution problems exist. For those difficult cases in which large between GC x GC run retention time shifts exist in both dimensions, a preliminary between runs first dimension peak alignment method by Correlation Optimized Shifting (COShift) is used to preserve the bilinearity model assumption needed for MCR-ALS application. The results showed the successful application of the proposed strategy for resolution and quantification of some target compounds in GC x GC analysis of simulated and of real samples. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据