4.6 Article

Processable and Robust MoS2 Paper Chemically Cross-Linked with Polymeric Ligands by the Coordination of Divalent Metal Ions

期刊

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 817-823

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201201177

关键词

layered compounds; mechanical properties; molybdenum; nanostructures; thin films

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21274079, 51073088, 91023027]
  2. NSF of Beijing [3122021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inorganic graphene analogues (IGAs) are a huge and fascinating family of compounds that have extraordinary electronic, mechanical, and thermal properties. However, one of the largest problems that face the industrial application of IGAs is their poor processability, which has led to a bottlenecking in the development of freestanding, large-area, IGA-based thin-film devices. Herein, we report a facile and cost-efficient method to chemically modify IGAs by using their abundant coordination atoms (S, O, and N). Taking MoS2 as an example, we have prepared homogeneous solution systems, in which MoS2 nanosheets are chemically cross-linked through a carboxylate-containing polymeric ligand, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), by copper-ion coordination. Bonding interactions between CO bonds and sulfur atoms through copper ions were confirmed by various characterization techniques, such as UV/Vis, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy and XPS. By using our method, freestanding MoS2 paper with significantly improved mechanical properties was obtained, thus laying the basis for the mass production of large-area MoS2-based thin-film devices. Furthermore, copper-ion coordination was also applied to MoS2/PMMA nanocomposites. Direct and strong nanofiller/matrix bonding interactions facilitate efficient load transfer and endow the polymeric nanocomposites with an excellent reinforcement effect. This method may pave a new way to high-strength polymeric nanocomposites with superior frictional properties, flame retardance, and oxidation resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据