4.6 Article

Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes by a Copper-Triazolate Metal-Organic Framework

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 63, 页码 16804-16813

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201803306

关键词

copper; dyes/pigments; metal-organic frameworks; photochemistry; semiconductors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471132]
  2. USA by NSF-CREST Center for Innovation, Research and Education in Environmental Nanotechnology (CIRE2N) [HRD-1736093]
  3. NASA [17-EPSCoRProp-0032]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [641887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A copper(I) 3,5-diphenyltriazolate metal-organic framework (CuTz-1) was synthesized and extensively characterized by using a multi-technique approach. The combined results provided solid evidence that CuTz-1 features an unprecedented Cu(5)tz(6) cluster as the secondary building unit (SBU) with channels approximately 8.3 angstrom in diameter. This metal-organic framework (MOF) material, which is both thermally and chemically (basic and acidic) stable, exhibited semiconductivity and high photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of dyes in the presence of H2O2. Its catalytic performance was superior to that of reported MOFs and comparable to some composites, which has been attributed to its high efficiency in generating (OH)-O-., the most active species for the degradation of dyes. It is suggested that the photogenerated holes are trapped by Cu-I, which yields Cu-II, the latter of which behaves as a catalyst for a Fenton-like reaction to produce an excess amount of (OH)-O-. in addition to that formed through the scavenging of photogenerated electrons by H2O2. Furthermore, it was shown that a dye mixture (methyl orange, methyl blue, methylene blue, and rhodamine B) could be totally decolorized by using CuTz-1 as a photocatalyst in the presence of H2O2 under the irradiation of a Xe lamp or natural sunlight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据