4.6 Article

Binding Modes and Selectivity of Ruthenium Complexes to Human Telomeric DNA G-Quadruplexes

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 58, 页码 15577-15588

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201802147

关键词

DNA recognition; G-quadruplexes; light switches; ruthenium complexes

资金

  1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS (Belgium) [1.B333.15F, F.4532.16, 2.4530.12, 2.4615.11, UN02715F, CDR J.0022.18]
  2. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme [PAI 7/05]
  3. Belgian Science Policy Office
  4. Fonds pour la Formation a la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA)
  5. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  6. Nouvelle Aquitaine Region
  7. Czech Science Foundation [P208/12/G016]
  8. National Program of Sustainability I from the Ministry-of-Youth, Education and Sports of the Czech Republic [LO1305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal complexes constitute an important class of DNA binders. In particular, a few ruthenium polyazaaromatic complexes are attractive as light switches because of their strong luminescence enhancement upon DNA binding. In this paper, a comprehensive study on the binding modes of several mononuclear and binuclear ruthenium complexes to human telomeric sequences, made of repeats of the d(TTAGGG) fragment is reported. These DNA sequences form G-quadruplexes (G4s) at the ends of chromosomes and constitute a relevant biomolecular target in cancer research. By combining spectroscopy experiments and molecular modelling simulations, several key properties are deciphered: the binding modes, the stabilization of G4 upon binding, and the selectivity of these complexes towards G4 versus double-stranded DNA. These results are rationalized by assessing the possible deformation of G4 and the binding free energies of several binding modes via modelling approaches. Altogether, this comparative study provides fundamental insights into the molecular recognition properties and selectivity of Ru complexes towards this important class of DNA G4s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据