4.6 Article

Development of Unique Xanthene-Cyanine Fused Near-Infrared Fluorescent Fluorophores with Superior Chemical Stability for Biological Fluorescence Imaging

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 733-745

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201404718

关键词

fluorescence sensing; fluorescent probes; hydrogen sulphide; living animal fluorescence imaging; NIR-fluorescent fluorophores

资金

  1. NSFC [21172063, 21472067]
  2. University of Jinan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of near-infrared (NIR) functional fluorescent dyes has gained increasing attention over the last few decades. Herein, we describe the development of a unique type of xanthene-cyanine fused NIR fluorophores, XC dyes, formed by reacting chloro-substituted cyanine with resorcin or its analogues under anhydrous conditions. XC dyes are a hybrid of cyanine and xanthene. The preliminary mechanistic studies indicate that the formation of XC compounds likely includes a sequence of cyclization and oxidation. XC dyes have absorption and emission in the NIR region, and their fluorescence properties can be controlled by modifications of the key hydroxyl and amine groups. The novel XC NIR dyes are advantageous over previously developed merocyanine dyes NIR dyes in their chemical stability against strong nucleophiles. Quantum chemical calculations reveal that the distinct properties of XC and HD dyes can be attributed to their structural differences. By taking advantage of the superior properties of XC dyes, we have further constructed a new NIR fluorescent probe, XC-H2S, which is capable of monitoring both the concentration-and time-dependent variations of H2S in living animals, highlighting the value of XC NIR dyes. We expect that the unique XC NIR dyes developed herein will find broader applications than HD NIR dyes as fluorescent platforms for the development of a wide variety of NIR fluorescent probes, in particular, those suitable for targets of interest that have strong nucleophilic character.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据