4.2 Review

A Historical Perspective on the Identification of Cell Types in Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans by Staining and Histochemical Techniques

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 8, 页码 543-558

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/0022155415589119

关键词

diabetes; beta cells; glucagon; immunocytochemistry; immunohistochemistry; insulin; islet cells; pancreas; staining; somatostatin

资金

  1. Office of Research and Development of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. Cellular and Molecular Imaging Core of the University of Washington Diabetes Research Center from the NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P30 DK017047]
  3. VA Senior Research Career Scientist award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Before the middle of the previous century, cell types of the pancreatic islets of Langerhans were identified primarily on the basis of their color reactions with histological dyes. At that time, the chemical basis for the staining properties of islet cells in relation to the identity, chemistry and structure of their hormones was not fully understood. Nevertheless, the definitive islet cell types that secrete glucagon, insulin, and somatostatin (A, B, and D cells, respectively) could reliably be differentiated from each other with staining protocols that involved variations of one or more tinctorial techniques, such as the Mallory-Heidenhain azan trichrome, chromium hematoxylin and phloxine, aldehyde fuchsin, and silver impregnation methods, which were popularly used until supplanted by immunohistochemical techniques. Before antibody-based staining methods, the most bona fide histochemical techniques for the identification of islet B cells were based on the detection of sulfhydryl and disulfide groups of insulin. The application of the classical islet tinctorial staining methods for pathophysiological studies and physiological experiments was fundamental to our understanding of islet architecture and the physiological roles of A and B cells in glucose regulation and diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据