4.6 Article

Pd-Catalysed Mono- and Dicarbonylation of Aryl Iodides: Insights into the Mechanism and the Selectivity

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 35, 页码 10982-10989

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201403022

关键词

carbonylation; chemoselectivity; density functional calculations; palladium; reaction mechanisms

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competividad (MINECO) of Spain (Ramon y Cajal fellowship) [CTQ2011-29054-C02-01, CTQ2011-27033, CTQ2010-14938/BQU, CTQ2011-22872BQU]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR116, 2009SGR259, 2009SGR746, 2009SGR462]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya (XRQTC)
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya (ICIQ Foundation)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism of the experimentally reported phosphine-free palladium-catalysed carbonylation of aryl iodides with amines in the presence of 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) as base was investigated at the DFT level. Paths were identified for both di-and monocarbonylation, and the calculated selectivity for three different substrates was in agreement with experiment. In dicarbonylation yielding a-ketoamides, formation of the second carbon-carbon bond occurs through reductive elimination in the Pd acyl amide intermediate after DBU-assisted nucleophilic attack of an amine at a terminal CO ligand. This path yields the major product with iodobenzene and the almost exclusive product with p-methoxyiodobenzene. Two different possible pathways yield the monocarbonylated amide product. In one of them, which affords the minor product for iodobenzene, base-assisted nucleophilic attack of the amine takes place on a Pd-bound acyl ligand. For substrates with electron-withdrawing substituents, such as p-cyanoiodobenzene, aryl migration to the CO ligand is disfavoured, and this allows base-assisted amine attack at a terminal CO ligand early in the catalytic cycle. From the resulting Pd amide aryl complex, the subsequent reductive elimination occurs easily, and monocarbonylation becomes favoured.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据