4.6 Article

Batch versus Flow Photochemistry: A Revealing Comparison of Yield and Productivity

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 46, 页码 15226-15232

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201404347

关键词

batch reactors; cycloaddition; flow photochemistry; rearrangement; scale-up

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. EPSRC [EP/K006053/1, EP/L003325/1]
  3. University of Bristol
  4. EPSRC Bristol Chemical Synthesis Doctoral Training Centre [EP/G036764/1]
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Syngenta
  7. EPSRC [EP/L003325/1, EP/K006053/1, EP/K03927X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1654052, GR/S25593/01, EP/L003325/1, EP/K006053/1, EP/K03927X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of flow photochemistry and its apparent superiority over batch has been reported by a number of groups in recent years. To rigorously determine whether flow does indeed have an advantage over batch, a broad range of synthetic photochemical transformations were optimized in both reactor modes and their yields and productivities compared. Surprisingly, yields were essentially identical in all comparative cases. Even more revealing was the observation that the productivity of flow reactors varied very little to that of their batch counterparts when the key reaction parameters were matched. Those with a single layer of fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) had an average productivity 20% lower than that of batch, whereas three-layer reactors were 20% more productive. Finally, the utility of flow chemistry was demonstrated in the scale-up of the ring-opening reaction of a potentially explosive [1.1.1] propellane with butane-2,3-dione.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据