4.6 Article

Synthesis of a Targeted Library of Heparan Sulfate Hexa- to Dodecasaccharides as Inhibitors of β-Secretase: Potential Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 21, 页码 6817-6823

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201204519

关键词

Alzheimer's; carbohydrates; glycosylation; heparan sulfate; synthesis

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK
  2. Medical Research Council UK
  3. BBSRC [BB/I004343/1, BB/D006325/1, BB/D525713/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G117/423] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-PPG2012B-25] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D006325/1, BB/D525713/1, BBS/B/13047, BB/I004343/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G117/423] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparan sulfates (HS) are a class of sulfated polysaccharides that function as dynamic biological regulators of the functions of diverse proteins. The structural basis of these interactions, however, remains elusive, and chemical synthesis of defined structures represents a challenging but powerful approach for unravelling the structureactivity relationships of their complex sulfation patterns. HS has been shown to function as an inhibitor of the -site cleaving enzyme -secretase (BACE1), a protease responsible for generating the toxic A peptides that accumulate in Alzheimer's disease (AD), with 6-O-sulfation identified as a key requirement. Here, we demonstrate a novel generic synthetic approach to HS oligosaccharides applied to production of a library of 16 hexa- to dodecasaccharides targeted at BACE1 inhibition. Screening of this library provided new insights into structureactivity relationships for optimal BACE1 inhibition, and yielded a number of potent non-anticoagulant BACE1 inhibitors with potential for development as leads for treatment of AD through lowering of A peptide levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据