4.6 Article

Charge-Assisted Halogen Bonding: Donor-Acceptor Complexes with Variable Ionicity

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 44, 页码 14804-14813

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201302507

关键词

charge transfer; conducting materials; crystal engineering; donor-acceptor systems; halogen bonding; noncovalent interactions

资金

  1. ANR (France) [ANR-08-BLAN-0091-01, ANR-08-BLAN-0091-02]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-BLAN-0091] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charge-assisted halogen bonding is unambiguously revealed from structural and electronic investigations of a series of isostructural charge-transfer complexes derived from iodinated tetrathiafulvalene and tetracyanoquinodimethane derivatives, (EDT-TTFI2)(2)(TCNQF(n)), n=0-2, which exhibit variable degrees of ionicity. The iodinated tetrathiafulvalene derivative, EDT-TTFI2, associates with tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and its derivatives of increasing reduction potential (TCNQF, TCNQF(2)) through highly directional C-I center dot center dot center dot N=C halogen-bond interactions. With the less oxidizing TCNQ acceptor, a neutral and insulating charge-transfer complex is isolated whereas with the more oxidizing TCNQF(2) acceptor, an ionic, highly conducting charge-transfer salt is found, both of 2:1 stoichiometry and isostructural with the intermediate TCNQF complex, in which a neutralionic conversion takes place upon cooling. A correlation between the degree of charge transfer and the C-I center dot center dot center dot N=C halogen-bond strength is established from the comparison of the structures of the three isostructural complexes at temperatures from 300 to 20 K, thus demonstrating the importance of electrostatics in the halogen-bonding interaction. The neutral-ionic conversion in (EDT-TTFI2)(2)(TCNQF) is further investigated through the temperature dependence of its magnetic susceptibility and the stretching modes of the C=N groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据