4.6 Article

One-Pot Synthesis, Characterization, and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of a BiOBr-Graphene Composite

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 45, 页码 14359-14366

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201200892

关键词

bismuth; charge separation; graphene; light absorption; photochemistry; solvothermal reduction

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB935704]
  2. National Outstanding Youth Foundations of China [50725825]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50908113, 11079002]
  4. Ministry of Education of China [20110002130007]
  5. Jiangxi Provincial Science & Technology Pillar Program [2010BSA20700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, a chemically bonded BiOBrgraphene composite (BiOBrRG) was prepared through a facile in situ solvothermal method in the presence of graphene oxide. Graphene oxide could be easily reduced to graphene under solvothermal conditions, and simultaneously BiOBr nanoplates with pure tetragonal phase were grown uniformly on the graphene surface. The structure and photoelectrochemical properties of the resulting materials were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and impedance and photocurrent action measurements. The combination of BiOBr and graphene introduces some properties of graphene into the photocatalysis reaction, such as excellent conductivity, adsorptivity, and controllability. A remarkable threefold enhancement in the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) was observed with as-prepared BiOBrRG as compared with pure BiOBr under visible light (?>420 nm). The enhanced photocatalytic activity could be attributed to the great adsorptivity of dyes, the extended photoresponse range, the negative shift in the Fermi level of BiOBrRG, and the high migration efficiency of photoinduced electrons, which may effectively suppress the charge recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据