4.6 Article

pH-Tunable Hydrogelators for Water Purification: Structural Optimisation and Evaluation

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 2692-2699

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201102137

关键词

electron microscopy; gels; self-assembly; supramolecular chemistry; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/G026203/1]
  2. UROP from University of Reading
  3. Diamond Light Source Ltd
  4. MCI [CTQ2009-13961]
  5. Universitat Jaume I [P1-1B2009-42, P1-1B2007-11]
  6. Generalitat Valenciana
  7. University of Reading
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C533526/1, EP/G026203/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/G026203/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A focused library of potential hydrogelators each containing two substituted aromatic residues separated by a urea or thiourea linkage have been synthesised and characterized. Six of these novel compounds are highly efficient hydrogelators, forming gels in aqueous solution at low concentrations (0.030.60 wt?%). Gels were formed through a pH switching methodology, by acidification of a basic solution (pH 14 to 4) either by addition of HCl or via the slow hydrolysis of glucono-d-lactone. Frequently, gelation was accompanied by a dramatic switch in the absorption spectra of the gelators, resulting in a significant change in colour, typically from a vibrant orange to pale yellow. Each of the gels was capable of sequestering significant quantities of the aromatic cationic dye, methylene blue, from aqueous solution (up to 1.02 g of dye per gram of dry gelator). Cryo-transmission electron microscopy of two of the gels revealed an extensive network of high aspect ratio fibers. The structure of the fibers altered dramatically upon addition of 20 wt?% of the dye, resulting in aggregation and significant shortening of the fibrils. This study demonstrates the feasibility for these novel gels finding application as inexpensive and effective water purification platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据