4.6 Article

Coordination Chemistry and Reactivity of Zinc Complexes Supported by a Phosphido Pincer Ligand

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 2349-2360

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201102414

关键词

copolymerization; density functional calculations; P ligands; ring-opening polymerization; zinc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation and characterization of new Zn-II complexes of the type [(PPP)ZnR] in which R=Et (1) or N(SiMe3)(2) (2) and PPP is a tridentate monoanionic phosphido ligand (PPP-H=bis(2-diphenylphosphinophenyl)phosphine) are reported. Reaction of ZnEt2 and Zn[N(SiMe3)(2)](2) with one equivalent of proligand PPP-H produced the corresponding tetrahedral zinc ethyl (1) and zinc amido (2) complexes in high yield. Homoleptic (PPP)(2)Zn complex 3 was obtained by reaction of the precursors with two equivalents of the proligand. Structural characterization of 13 was achieved by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (H-1, C-13, and P-31) and X-ray crystallography (3). Variable-temperature H-1 and P-31 NMR studies highlighted marked flexibility of the phosphido pincer ligand in coordination at the metal center. A DFT calculation on the compounds provided theoretical support for this behavior. The activities of 1 and 2 toward the ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone and of L- and rac-lactide were investigated, also in combination with an alcohol as external chain-transfer agent. Polyesters with controlled molecular parameters (M-n, end groups) and low polydispersities were obtained. A DFT study on ring-opening polymerization promoted by these complexes highlighted the importance of the coordinative flexibility of the ancillary ligand to promote monomer coordination at the reactive zinc center. Preliminary investigations showed the ability of these complexes to promote copolymerization of L-lactide and epsilon-caprolactone to achieve random copolymers whose microstructure reproduces the composition of the monomer feed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据