4.6 Article

Quantum-Chemical and Electrochemical Investigation of the Electrochemical Windows of Halogenated Carborate Anions

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 1784-1795

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201202475

关键词

carboranes; electrochemistry; Jahn-Teller distortion; quantum chemistry; voltammetry

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The range of electrochemical stability of a series of weakly coordinating halogenated (Hal=F, Cl, Br, I) 1-carba-closo-dodecaborate anions, [1-R-CB11X5Y6]- (R=H, Me; X=H, Hal, Me; Y=Hal), has been established by using quantum chemical calculations and electrochemical methods. The structures of the neutral and dianionic radicals, as well as the anions, have been optimized by using DFT calculations at the PBE0/def2-TZVPP level. The calculated structures are in good agreement with existing experimental data and with previous calculations. Their gas-phase ionization energies and electron affinities were calculated based on their optimized structures and were compared with experimental (cyclic and square-wave) voltammetry data. Electrochemical oxidation was performed in MeCN at room temperature and in liquid sulfur dioxide at lower temperatures. All of the anions show a very high resistance to the onset of oxidation (2.152.85 V versus Fc0/+), with only a minor dependence of the oxidation potential on the different halogen substituents. In contrast, the reduction potentials in MeCN are strongly substituent dependent (-1.93 to -3.32 V versus Fc0/+). The calculated ionization energies and electron affinities correlate well with the experimental redox potentials, which provide important verification of the thermodynamic validity of the mostly irreversible redox processes that are observed for this series. The large electrochemical windows that are afforded by these anions indicate their suitability for electrochemical applications, for example, as supporting electrolytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据