4.6 Article

Current Chemical Biology Tools for Studying Protein Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 28-39

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201103206

关键词

activity-based protein profiling; biosensors; kinase; phosphatase; phosphorylation; small-molecule microarray

资金

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research [R-143-000-391-305]
  2. Ministry of Education [R-143-000-394-112]
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore [R143-000-218-281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amongst different posttranslational events involved in cellular-signaling pathways, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins are the most prevalent. Aberrant regulations in the cellular phosphoproteome network are implicated in most major human diseases. Consequently, kinases and phosphatases are two of the most important groups of drug targets in medicinal research today. A major challenge in the understanding of protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation is the sheer complexity of the phosphoproteome network and the lack of tools capable of studying protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation as they occur in cells. We highlight herein various chemical biology tools that have emerged in the last decade for such studies. First, we discuss the use of small-molecule mimics of phosphoamino acids and their use in elucidating the function of protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. We also introduce recent advances in the field of activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) for proteome-wide detection of protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. We next discuss the key concepts in the design of peptide- and protein-based biosensors capable of real-time reporting of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events. Finally, we highlight the application of peptide and small-molecule microarrays (SMMs), and their applications in high-throughput screening and discovery of new compounds related to phosphorylation/dephosphorylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据