4.6 Article

Surface Assembly of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets on SiO2 Particles for the Selective Isolation of Hemoglobin

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 17, 页码 4864-4870

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201003361

关键词

graphene; hemoglobin; proteins; solid-phase extractions; self-assembly

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20805004, 21005011, 21005013, 21075013, 20725517, 20821120292]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N090105001, N090405004, N090605001, N100305003, N100305004, N100605002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets have been immobilized onto SiO2 particles through electrostatic interactions by surface assembly. The surface-assembled composite material was characterized by means of SEM and FTIR and UV/Vis spectroscopy to reveal an assembling ratio of 2.3% (w/w, GO/SiO2). The GO/SiO2 composites were subsequently used, for the first time, as adsorbents for the adsorption/isolation of proteins. Selective isolation of proteins of interest, namely, hemoglobin (Hb) in this case, from complex sample matrices, for example, human whole blood, could be obtained by carefully manipulating the adsorption/desorption process. At pH 7, an adsorption of 85% was achieved for Hb (70 mgL(-1)) in sample solution (1.0 mL) by the GO/SiO2 composites (3.0 mg). The adsorption behavior was consistent with the Langmuir adsorption model, corresponding to a theoretical adsorption capacity of 50.5 mgg(-1) for Hb. The retained Hb could be readily recovered by using a Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.9 to give a recovery of 80%. Circular dichroism and specific activity investigations indicated that the GO/SiO2 composites exhibited favorable biocompatibility, characterized by virtually no effect on the conformation and activity of Hb after adsorption/desorption. The composites were used for the selective isolation of Hb from human whole blood and achieved satisfactory results by assaying with sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据