4.8 Review

Can we use HCC risk scores to individualize surveillance in chronic hepatitis B infection?

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 722-732

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.019

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatitis B virus; Cirrhosis; Transient elastography; HBV DNA

资金

  1. Abbott
  2. Anadys
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Gilead Sciences
  5. Innogenetics
  6. Medtronic
  7. Merck
  8. Novartis
  9. Roche
  10. Santaris
  11. Tibotec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic hepatitis B is one of the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Accurate prediction of HCC risk is important for decisions on antiviral therapy and HCC surveillance. In the last few years, a number of Asian groups have derived and validated several HCC risk scores based on well-known risk factors such as cirrhosis, age, male sex and high viral load. Overall, these scores have high negative predictive values of over 95% in excluding HCC development in 3 to 10 years. The REACH-B score was derived from a community cohort of non-cirrhotic patients and is better applied in the primary care setting. In contrast, the GAG-HCC and CU-HCC scores were derived from hospital cohorts and include cirrhosis as a major integral component. While the latter scores may be more applicable to patients at specialist clinics, the diagnosis of cirrhosis based on routine imaging and clinical parameters can be inaccurate. To this end, recent developments in non-invasive tests of liver fibrosis may further refine the risk prediction. The application of HCC risk scores in patients on antiviral therapy and in other ethnic groups should be evaluated in future studies. (C) 2015 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据