4.6 Article

A Highly Selective, Cell-Permeable Fluorescent Nanoprobe for Ratiometric Detection and Imaging of Peroxynitrite in Living Cells

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 24, 页码 6626-6634

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100148

关键词

bioimaging; fluorescent probes; nanoparticles; peptides; peroxynitrite

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB936000]
  2. National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [20725518]
  3. National Key Natural Science Foundation of China [21035003]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province in China [ZR2010BZ001]
  5. Science and Technology Development Programs of Shandong Province of China [2008GG30003012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxynitrite (ONOO-) is a highly reactive species implicated in the pathology of numerous diseases and there is currently great interest in developing fluorescent probes that can selectively detect ONOO- in living cells. Herein, a polymeric micelle-based and cell-penetrating peptide-coated fluorescent nanoprobe that incorporates ONOO- indicator dye and reference dye for the ratiometric detection and imaging of ONOO- has been developed. The nanoprobe effectively avoids the influences from enzymatic reaction and high-concentration (OH)-O-center dot and ClO-. The improved ONOO- selectivity of the nanoprobe is achieved by a delicate complementarity of properties between the nanomatrix and the embedded molecular probe ( BzSe-Cy). This nanoprobe also has other attractive properties, such as good water solubility, photostability, biocompatibility, and near-infrared excitation and emission. Fluorescence imaging experiments by confocal microscopy show that this nanoprobe is capable of visualizing ONOO- produced in living cells and it exhibits very low toxicity and good membrane permeability. We anticipate that this technique will be a potential tool for the precise pathological understanding and diagnosis of ONOO--related human diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据