4.6 Article

A Computational Study of the Olefin Epoxidation Mechanism Catalyzed by Cyclopentadienyloxidomolybdenum(VI) Complexes

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 2147-2158

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200902873

关键词

density functional calculations; epoxidation; homogeneous catalysis; molybdenum; oxido ligands

资金

  1. European Commission [MRTN-CT-2003-503864]
  2. Spanish MICINN [CTQ2008-06866-CO2-01, CSD2007-00006]
  3. CNRS
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009/SGR/68]
  5. CICT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A DFT analysis of the epoxidation of C2H4 by H2O2 and MeOOH (as models of tert-butylhydroperoxide, TBHP) catalyzed by [CP*MoO2Cl] (1) in CHCl3 and by [Cp*MoO2(H2O)](+) in water is presented (Cp*=pentamethyl-cyclopentadienyl). The calculations were performed both in the gas phase and in solution with the use of the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM). A low-energy pathway has been identified, which starts with the activation of ROOH (R=H or Me) to form a hydro/alkylperoxido derivative, [Cp*MoO(OH)(OOR)Cl] or [Cp*MoO(OH)(OOR)](+) with barriers of 24.9 (26.5) and 28.7 (29.2) kcal mol(-1) for H2O2 (MeOOH), respectively, in solution. The latter barrier, however, is reduced to only 1,0 (1.6) kcal mol(-1) when one additional water molecule is explicitly included in the calculations. The hydro/alkylperoxido ligand in these intermediates is eta(2)-coordinated, with a significant interaction between the Mo center and the O-beta atom. The subsequent step is a nucleophilic attack of the ethylene molecule on the activated O-alpha atom, requiring 13.9 (17.8) and 16.1 (17.7) kcal mol(-1) in solution, respectively. The corresponding transformation, catalyzed by the peroxido complex [Cp*MoO(O-2)Cl] in CHCl3, requires higher barriers for both steps (ROOH activation: 34.3 (35.2) kcal mol(-1); O atom transfer: 28.5 (30.3) kcal mol(-1)), which is attributed to both greater steric crowding and to the greater electron density on the metal atom.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据