4.6 Article

A Solid-Supported Organocatalyst for Highly Stereoselective, Batch, and Continuous-Flow Mannich Reactions

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 39, 页码 10167-10172

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200901310

关键词

aldehydes; asymmetric catalysis; flow reactors; Mannich reactions; organocatalysis

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia a Innovacion [CTQ2008-00947/13QU]
  2. Department d'Innovacio. Universitats Empresa [2005SGR225]
  3. Consolider Ingenio 2010 [CSD2006-0003]
  4. Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ) Foundation
  5. ICIQ foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fast and highly stereoselective Mannich reaction of aldehydes and ketones with the N-(p-methoxyphenyl) ethyl glyoxylate imine catalyzed by polystyrene. resins functionalized with (2SAR)-hydroxyproline is reported The effect of the nature of the linker connecting proline with the polymeric backbone has been studied, and a 1,2,3-triazole linker constructed front azidomethyl polystyrene and O-propargyl hydroxyproline turns out to be optimal for catalytic activity and enantioselectivity. With aldehyde donors. fast reactions leading to complete con-version in 1-3 h are recorded in DMF Willi ketone donors. the reactions tend to be slower, but can be efficiently accelerated (six-membered ring cycloalkanones) by low-power microwave irradiation. This approach, which greatly facilitates product isolation since the catalyst is removed by simple filtration. has allowed the implementation of the reactions of aldehyde Substrates in a continuous-flow. single-pass system In this manner, the Continuous synthesis of the enantiomerically and diastereomerically pure adducts (synlann > 97:3: ee>99%) has been achieved at room temperature with residence times of 6.0 mm. This methodology has allowed for the preparation of up to 7.8 mmol elf the desired Mannich adduct through the use of 046 mmol of catalytic resin (5 9 mol%), in at greatly simplified experimental protocol that avoids purification steps

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据