4.6 Review

Total Syntheses of Amphidinolides B1, B4, G1, H1 and Structure Revision of Amphidinolide H2

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 16, 页码 3983-4010

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200802067

关键词

anticancer agents; macrocyclization; metathesis; natural products; Stille coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dinoflagellates of the genus Amphidinium produce a library of closely related secondary metabolites of mixed polyketide origin, which are extremely scarce but highly promising owing to the exceptional cytotoxicity against various Cancer Cell lines. Because of the dense array of sensitive functionalities oil their largely conserved macrocyclic frame, however, these amphidinolides of the B, D, G and H types elapsed many previous attempts at their synthesis. Described herein is a robust, Convergent and hence general blueprint Which allowed not only to conquest five prototype members Of these Series. but also holds the promise of making non-natural analogues available by diverted total synthesis. This notion transpires for a synthesis-driven structure revision of amphidinolide H2. The Successful route hinges upon a highly productive Stille-Migita cross-coupling reaction at the congested and chemically labile 1.3-diene site present in all such targets, which required the development of a modified chloride- and fluoride-free protocol. The macrocyclic ring could be formed with high efficiency and selectivity by ring-closing metathesis (RCM) engaging a vinyl epoxide unit as one of the reaction partners. Because of the sensitivity of the targets to oxidizing and reducing conditions as well as to pH changes. the proper adjustment of the protecting group pattern for the peripheral -OH functions also constitutes a critical aspect, which has to converge to silyl groups only once the diene is in place. Tris(dimethylamino)sulfonium difluorotrimethylsilicate (TASF) turned Out to be a sufficiently mild fluoride Source 10 allow for the final deprotection without damaging the precious macrolides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据