4.6 Article

Environmentally Friendly gamma-MnO2 Hexagon-Based Nanoarchitectures: Structural Understanding and Their Energy-Saving Applications

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 492-500

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200801814

关键词

environmental chemistry; manganese oxide; nanostructures; structure elucidation; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20801051, 20621061]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20080430102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although about 200,000 metric tons of gamma-MnO2 are used annually worldwide for industrial applications, the gamma-MnO2 structure is still known to possess a highly ambiguous crystal lattice. To better understand the gamma-MnO2 atomic structure, hexagon-based nanoarchitectures were successfully synthesized and used to elucidate its internal structure for the present work. The structural analysis results, obtained from the hexagon-based nanoarchitectures, clearly show the coexistence of akhtenskite (epsilon-MnO2), pyrolusite (beta-MnO2), and ramsdellite in the so-called gamma-MnO2 phase and verified the heterogeneous phase assembly of the gamma-MnO2 state. which violates the well-known De Wolff model and derivative models, but partially accords with Heuer's results. Furthermore, heterogeneous gamma-MnO2 assembly was found to be a metastable structure under hydrothermal conditions, and the individual components of the heterogeneous gamma-MnO2 system have structural similarities and a high lattice matches with pyrolusite (beta-MnO2). The as-obtained gamma-MnO2 nanoarchitectures nontoxic and environmentally a re friendly, and the application of such nanoarchitectures as support matrices Successfully mitigates the common problems for phase-change materials of inorganic salts, such as phase separation and supercooling-effects, thereby showing prospect in energy-saving applications in future smart-house systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据