4.8 Article

Conductive and Polar Titanium Boride as a Sulfur Host for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 20, 页码 6969-6977

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01352

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21471091]
  2. Academy of Sciences large apparatus United Fund [U1832187]
  3. Guangdong Province Science and Technology Plan Project for Public Welfare Fund and Ability Construction Project [2017A010104003]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Funds [JCYJ20170818104441521]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC022]
  6. Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province [572ts201511004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur batteries are the most promising candidates for advanced electrochemical energy storage systems benefiting from their high energy density and low cost of sulfur. Improving the conductivity of sulfur cathode and stabilizing the polysulfide shuttle are the key factors for obtaining high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Herein, metallic and polar TiB2 nanomaterials are applied for the first time as sulfur hosts. The 70S/TiB2 composite exhibits a long-term cycling stability up to 500 cycles at the current density of 1 C. It is worth noting that even when the sulfur areal mass loading is up to 3.9 mg cm(-2), a stable capacity of 837 mA h g(-1) can be still maintained after 100 cycles. The outstanding electrochemical performance can be attributed to the strong anchoring effect of TiB2 to lithium polysulfides, which is confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses and theoretical calculations with a favorable surface-passivated chemistry. The study presented here will shed a new light for metal borides as hosts to improve the cycling life of lithium-sulfur batteries and provide a deep comprehension of the instinct interaction evolution at a molecular level, which is invaluable in the material rational fabrication for future high-performance Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据