4.8 Article

Robust, Highly Thermally Stable, Core-Shell Nanostructured Metal Oxide Aerogels as High-Temperature Thermal Superinsulators, Adsorbents, and Catalysts

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 19, 页码 5761-5772

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm502886t

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51172163, 51102184, U1230113]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2013BAJO1B01]
  3. 863 Project of China, Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [11 nm0501600, 12 nm0503001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Bayer-Tongji Eco-Construction & Material Academy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robust, highly thermally stable, MOx/(MOx-SiO2)/SiO2 core shell nanostructured metal oxide aerogels with a MOx core and (MOx-SiO2)/SiO2 shell are produced via novel alkmdde chemical liquid deposition techniques. The core shell nanostructure not only significantly reinforces the nanoparticles but also effectively inhibits the crystal growth and phase transition of metal oxide upon heat treatment, which enhances the heat resistance from approximate 400 800 degrees C up to 1000-1300 degrees C. The resultant core shell nanostructured Al2O3, ZrO2, and TiO2 aerogels can support at least 5800 times their weight and exhibit high surface areas of 139, 186, and 154 m(2)/g after fired at 1300, 1000, and 1000 degrees C, respectively, which are the highest surface areas for metal oxide aerogels ever reported. We demonstrate that the core shell ZrO2 and TiO2 aerogels show enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic performances, respectively, for dye after fired at 1000 degrees C. The core shell Al2O3 aerogel/mullite fiber/TiO2 composite possesses ultralow thermal conductivities of 0.058, 0.080, and 0.11 W/mK at 800, 1000, and 1200 degrees C, respectively, which are the lowest values for inorganic aerogels ever reported. The resulting materials are promising candidates as hightemperature (400-1300 degrees C) thermal superinsulators, adsorbents, and catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据