4.8 Article

Temperature-Induced Energy Transfer in Dye-Conjugated Upconverting Nanoparticles: A New Candidate for Nanothermometry

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 235-244

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm503799f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Canadian Institute for Photonic Innovations (CIPI)
  3. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Nature et Technologies (FRQNT)
  4. NanoQuebec
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  6. Fundacion Ramon Areces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lanthanide-doped upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs) are highly promising candidates for bioimaging and for cellular nanothermometry as a novel diagnostic tool. Aiming for the diagnosis of diseases at very early stages in order to optimize therapy and recovery of the patient, it must be taken into account that thermal singularities are often one of the first indicators of a disease. It is therefore our goal to develop a nanothermometer based on UCNPs that is suitable to detect the temperature at a subcellular level in the physiological range. Thus, upconverting NaGdF4:Er-3+,Yb3+ nanoparticles that convert near-infrared (NIR) into visible (VIS) light are synthesized by thermal decomposition. Appropriate surface modification with a thermoresponsive polymer pNIPAM (poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)) guarantees dispersibility in aqueous media required for biomedical applications. In a further step, the combination of the obtained UCNPs with an organic dye (FluoProbe532A) provides potential donor-acceptor-pairs allowing for energy transfer processes, whereas the light emitted by the Er3+ ions (donors) is absorbed by the organic dye (acceptor). It has been demonstrated that the dye-conjugated UCNPs undergo a temperature-dependent energy transfer process inducing a temperature-dependent increase in the thermal sensitivity when compared to unlabeled UCNPs. This result indicates the great potential of the presented nanoprobes for applications in nanothermometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据