4.8 Article

Influence of Defects and Synthesis Conditions on the Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Semiconductor CsSnl3

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 20, 页码 6068-6072

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm503122j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Funds for Major State Basic Research
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  3. International Collaboration Project
  4. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar)
  5. NSFC [61106087, 91233121, 10934002]
  6. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [14QA1401500]
  7. United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CsSnI3 is a prototype inorganic halide perovskite that has recently been proposed as a strong candidate for photovoltaic applications because of its unique semiconductor properties. Through first-principle calculations, we show that the concentration control of intrinsic defects is critical for optimizing the photovoltaic properties of CsSnI3. Under a Sn-poor condition, a high concentration of acceptor defects, such as Sn or Cs vacancies, can form easily and produce a high p-type conductivity and deep-level defects that can become electronhole recombination centers, all with high energy. This condition is optimal for growing CsSnI3 as hole-transport material in solar cells. In contrast, when Sn becomes richer, the concentration of acceptor defects decreases; therefore, the p-type conductivity may drop to a moderate level, which can increase the shunt resistance and, thus, the efficiency of the solar cells with CsSnI3 as the light absorber material (LAM). However, under the Sn-rich condition, the concentration of a deep-level donor defect SnI will increase, causing electron traping and non-radiative electronhole recombination. Therefore, we propose that a moderately Sn-rich condition is optimal when CsSnI3 is used as the LAM. The defect properties of CsSnI3 are general, and the underlying chemistry is expected to be applicable to other halide perovskite semiconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据