4.8 Article

Dual Template Synthesis of Meso- and Microporous MFI Zeolite Nanosheet Assemblies with Tailored Activity in Catalytic Reactions

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1345-1355

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm401119d

关键词

-

资金

  1. PI's start-up fund at the University of Maryland-College Park
  2. ACS-Petroleum Research Fund (ACS-PRF)
  3. Maryland NanoCenter and its NispLab
  4. NSF as a MRSEC Shared Experimental Facility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dual template synthesis strategy was employed to achieve one-step design of meso- and microporous MFI nanosheet assemblies with tailored morphology, mesoporosity, and catalytic activity. A molecular template (tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, TPAOH) and a polyquaternary ammonium surfactant ([C22H45-N+(CH3)(2)-C6H12-N+(CH3)(2)-C6H13]Br-2, C22-6-6) were used as cotemplates in the synthesis with a composition of 30Na(2)O/1Al(2)O(3)/100SiO(2)/10C(22-6-6)/xTPAOH/4000H(2)O/18H(2)SO(4). By tuning the concentration Of TPAOH (x) from 0 to 20, the morphology of the as-obtained MFI nanosheet assemblies changed from intertwined, to house-of-cards-like, and to dense packing plates. The N-2 isotherms showed the hysteresis loop at the range of P/P-0 = 0.45-1.0 increases, reaches a maximum, and then decreases with increasing x values, indicating a systematic tailoring of the mesoporosity with TPAOH concentrations. Under strict kinetic control, the rates and apparent activation energies of the ethanol activation in zeolite nanosheet assemblies were comparable. The catalytic conversion of benzyl alcohol in mesitylene showed that the activity of as-obtained MFI zeolites increases, reaching a maximum, and then decreases with increasing x values. The consistency in the variation of morphology, mesoporosity, and catalytic activity with varying x values in the synthesis indicates TPAOH can be used as a secondary template to tailor the textural and catalytic properties of MFI nanosheet assemblies primarily guided by C22-6-6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据