4.8 Article

Understanding and Controlling the Surface Chemistry of LiFeSO4F for an Enhanced Cathode Functionality

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 15, 页码 3020-3029

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm401063s

关键词

battery; fluorosulfate; polymer coating; powder X-ray diffraction; Mossbauer spectroscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tavorite polymorph of LiFeSO4F has recently attracted a lot of interest as a cathode material for lithium ion batteries stimulated by its competitive specific capacity, high potential for the Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couple, and low-temperature synthesis. However, the synthesis routes explored to date have resulted in notably varied electrochemical performance. This inconsistency is difficult to understand given the excellent purity, crystallinity, and similar morphologies achieved via all known methods. In this work, we examine the role of the interfacial chemistry on the electrochemical functionality of LiFeSO4F. We demonstrate that particularly poor electrochemical performance may be obtained for pristine materials synthesized in tetraethylene glycol (TEG), which represents one of the most economically viable production methods. By careful surface characterization, we show that this restricted performance can be largely attributed to residual traces of TEG remaining on the surface of pristine materials, inhibiting the electrochemical reactions. Moreover, we show that optimized cycling performance of LiFeSO4F can be achieved by removing the unwanted residues and applying a conducting polymer coating, which increases the electronic contact area between the electrode components and creates a highly percolating network for efficient electron transport throughout the composite material. This coating is produced using a simple and scalable method designed to intrinsically favor the functionality of the final product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据