4.8 Article

Solution-Processed Double-Silicon-Bridged Oxadiazole/Arylamine Hosts for High-Efficiency Blue Electrophosphorescence

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 16, 页码 3120-3127

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm301032p

关键词

blue phosphorescent OLEDs; solution-processed; host materials; double-silicon-bridged

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51125013]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB623602, 2009CB930603]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90922020]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of oxadiazole/arylamine hybrids, namely pOXDDSiPA, pOXDDSiCz, mOXDDSiPA, and mOXDDSiCz, were designed and synthesized by incorporating electron donating diphenylamine or 3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazole unit and electron accepting oxadiazole moiety into one molecule via double-silicon-bridged linkage. This design strategy of extending molecular structure endows these compounds with good solution processability, and high thermal and morphological stability, without lowering their triplet energies. These compounds exhibit similar energy levels and higher glass transition temperatures (92-190 degrees C) relative to the corresponding single-silicon-bridged congeners. The reasonable combination of the tetra-meta-position linking topology and electron donor diphenylamine group imparts the. compound mOXDDSiPA with both relative high triplet energy (2.72 eV) and high lying HOMO level (5.30 eV). As a result, the best EL performance was achieved for the mOXDDSiPA-based blue phosphorescent device, with a maximum current efficiency of 23.4 cd A(-1), a maximum power efficiency of 10.2 lm W-1, and a maximum external quantum efficiency of 10.7%. Moreover, the current efficiency remains as high as 23.3 cd A(-1) at the luminance of 100 cd m(-2), and even at the high luminance of 1000 cd m(-2), the efficiency is still 17.7 cd A(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据