4.8 Article

Preparation of High Concentration Dispersions of Exfoliated MoS2 with Increased Flake Size

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 2414-2421

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm301515z

关键词

layered compound; exfoliation; two-dimensional; dispersion; nanosheets; composite

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [07/IN.1/I1772]
  2. European Research Council [SEMANTICS]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/IN.1/I1772] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solvent exfoliation of inorganic layered compounds is likely to be important for a range of applications. However, this method generally gives dispersions of small nanosheets at low concentrations. Here we describe methods, based on sonication of powdered MoS2 in the solvent N-methyl-pyrrolidone, to prepare dispersions with significantly increased lateral nanosheet size and dispersed concentration. We find the concentration to scale linearly with starting MoS2 mass allowing the definition of a yield. This yield can be increased to similar to 40% by controlling the sonication time, resulting in concentrations as high as similar to 40 mg/mL. We find the nanosheet size to increase initially with sonication time reaching similar to 700 nm (for a concentration of similar to 7.5 mg/mL). At longer sonication times the nanosheets size falls off due to sonication induced scission. The nanosheets produced by such methods are relatively thin and have no observable defects. We can separate the dispersed nanosheets by size using controlled centrifugation. This allows us to produce dispersions with mean flake size of up to similar to 2 mu m. However, such large flakes are noticeably thicker than the standard nanosheets. We demonstrate that such nanosheets can be mixed with polymers to form composites. While standard nanosheets result in no improvement in composite mechanical properties, addition of size-selected nanosheets results in significant improvements in composite modulus and strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据